Office of the Chief Technology Officer: Quality and Performance Management
DC Home Mayor DC Guide Residents Business Visitors DC Government Kids

Office of the Chief Technology Officer

OCTO HOME
OCTO HOME
SERVICES
ABOUT OCTO
INFORMATION
SERVICES
ONLINE SERVICE
  REQUESTS

INFORMATION
ONLINE SERVICE
  REQUESTS

About OCTO
How to Reach Us
Ask the CTO
FOIA Requests
News Room
Employment
  Opportunities

Site Map
Performance
CityDW
DC GIS
DC-NET
DC-WARN
ASMP
HSMP
Photo Gallery
Policies, Guidelines, &
  Procedures

DC IT Investment Board
Program Management
  Standards

Web Standards
  and Style

CTO's Biography
Mission & Goals
Organizational Chart

Quality and Performance Management
 
Quality and Performance Management processes ensure that each program deliverable meets the objectives of the program within predetermined standards.
Quality Management
  1. Perform Requirements Quality Verification. The requirements quality verification process ensures that requirements that fall within the project's scope are clearly described. Verify requirements are met throughout each phase of the program lifecycle (in the checklist below).
    • Solution description
    • Contractor responsibilities
    • District responsibilities
    • Assumptions
    • Dependencies of external processes
    • Deliverable descriptions
    • Completion criteria for all deliverables and services
    • Testability-expected results
  2. Develop a Quality Plan. The quality plan describes how the program will ensure requirements are met (see Acceptance Criteria), and defines a procedure for handling requirements that are not in compliance to the established level of quality.
  3. Conduct Independent Validation and Verification (IVV) Reviews. An IVV team can be assembled for key portions of the program to continuously monitor the process and assure the quality of the outcome.
  4. Conduct External Audit Reviews. External program and technical audits are used to assure compliance with the program plan, policies, and procedures.
  5. Maintain Accurate and Complete Documentation. Project-related documentation created while employed by the District government is solely owned by the District government. As such, accurate and complete records of proposed documents used for delivery of approved program deliverables are to be maintained and stored at locations directly under the District s purview.
Performance Management
  1. Develop Performance Acceptance Criteria. An acceptance criterion is a quantifiable measurement used to establish if a deliverable has met predetermined requirement factors.
  2. Metrics and Measurement. Program performance is measured and tracked against the baseline schedules and plans approved at the close of the spending authorization process. The following areas are to be monitored at a minimum: requirements stability, cost, funding, schedule, staffing, technical performance, customer relations, quality contractors, and risk. Additional program development, software development, or service level performance metrics may also be indicated.